Archive for May, 2009

Reducing salaries is in line with economic losses

Sunday, May 31st, 2009

When society experiences a loss of wealth, as we have, then the cost of government services must be reduced and only if needed should the services be reduced.

Home values are down. A couple of two thousand square foot homes in Orange city sold at auction for $120,000 each. Good commercial property went unsold at auction. Land values have fallen because no one is buying. The West Volusia Chamber of Commerce is struggling to survive. Infrastructure for future homes can be found all over the county standing in the weeds, but building has stopped.

Interest rates and investment return is way down. For many people who did invest they have lost 40% of what ever they had. Certificates of deposit are yielding about 2 %. Almost one in ten people is unemployed and another 2 in ten are under employed. People who made $20 an hour for skill trade work will rake leaves or wash houses for $10 or less an hour.

It would be the wrong thing to do to layoff or fire government employees. This would contribute more foreclosures, greater unemployment and underemployment, more saving would be spent, bankruptcy from the failure to pay credit oblations would increase, and there would be less business for businesses to survive on.

The right thing is to deflate the wages and benefits of government employees. Approached on a sliding scale starting at $44k in salary all government employees should receive a 5 to 15% cut in pay. Those making $100k or more should be cut 15%. Employees below $44k would have wages frozen. All vacant positions and all vacancies would be frozen, with fire and police services having the option to present their needs to fill positions quarterly in public hearing before elected officials. All salary and wages schedules for hiring after the freeze should be reduced by 15% for all employees. 

The required payments of florida retirement system, workmans comp, social security and medicare, plus future cash payments for unused leave represent a large increase in generous salaries. 

Change healthcare and benefits programs. Raise all deductibles in healthcare insurance. Rewrite the policies on sick leave to make no portion of it equal to cash at retirement or leaving employment. Limit the accumulation of annual leave to 30 days and limit the amount of leave paid out in cash at retirement or leaving employment. These are benefits not cash or investments.

Compare the cuts that have happened in real life with the cuts government needs to make to their operational costs. I am not suggesting that salaries be cut 50% like many underemployed people have experienced. I am not suggesting salary schedules be reduced by 40% like the value of homes and investments.

I am suggesting that all the government workers need to keep working, but to be compensated at a level that has a relationship to the loss of wealth that has occurred. The increase in wealth was the very measure of why the cost of government did go up. The wealth of our communities has gone down. So it is only natural that the costs of government must go down without making the problems greatly worse.

Position Title    Salary  Reduction proposed salary .
City Manager $ 108,386.00                   15%                    $ 92,128.10
Police Chief              $ 93,288.00                               12.50%             $ 81,627.00
Deputy Fire Chief   $ 70,137.60                                 7.5%               $ 64,877.28
Finance Director    $ 68,785.60                                    5%                 $ 65,346.32
Police Commander $ 68,140.80                                   5%                 $ 64,733.76
Fire Chief                     $ 66,081.60                                  5%                 $ 62,777.52
City Planner                $ 64,833.60                                 5%                  $ 61,591.92
City Clerk                      $ 64,187.76                                 5%                 $ 60,978.37
PW Director                 $ 62,878.40                                 5%                 $ 59,734.48
Police Sgt-2                  $ 60,016.32                                 5%                 $ 57,015.50
Lt. FF Paramedic- (1 ) $ 55,735.68                              5.00%          $ 52,948.90
Police Sgt -1                     $ 54,927.60                              5.00%         $ 52,181.22
Utilities Superintendent $ 52,332.80                          5.00%         $ 49,716.16
Police Sgt. 1.                         $ 48,790.56                          2.50%         $ 46,351.03
Police Sgt. 2.                         $ 48,790.56                          2.50%         $ 46,351.03
Police Lt.-                              $ 48,318.40                           2.50%         $ 45,902.48
Cust. Svc. Sup                       $ 48,443.00                          2.50%         $ 46,020.85
HR/ Risk Manager               $ 46,176.00                         2.50%          $ 43,867.20
Total                                    $ 1,130,250.28 .                                   $ 1,054,149.13 
 40% required payments $ 1,582,350.39                                     $ 1,475,808.78
budget reduction                                                                         $ 106,541.62

Luck of the draw sets council district numbers.

Wednesday, May 20th, 2009

After selecting the map of boundaries, the city council used luck of the draw to determine how districts are numbered, and with the election schedule already set in the city charter it sets into motion some political consequences.  The luck of the draw method was supported by six members of council with the Mayor favoring council choosing to assign the numbers.

 

The districts now have the following council members living in them.  District 3 has Mr. Abraham, Mr. Sherrill and Mr. Rasch.  Mr. Abraham’s term ends in 2011, after the election for the district he lives in.  Mr. Rasch and Mr. Sherrill have terms that end in November of 2009 and if they choose to run for council this year they could return to council in the at large seat to be elected this fall.  Mr. Allebach, who holds seat 1 lives in district two, will remain on the council and could run for district 2 or mayor in 2011 to remain on the council.  Mr. Laputka holds seat 2 but lives in District 4 could choose to run for his district in 2009 or serve out his term and run for mayor in 2011.  Mr. Mahoney holds seat 6 which is up for election this year as an at large council seat.   Between August 10 – 20 qualifying for districts 4, 5 and the at large seat will be held.  The election will be held 32 days later on September 22.  If no candidate for any office receives at least 50% + 1 of the votes cast, then a run off will be conducted on November 3.

 

Who will run from district 5 is another interesting question to be answered by August 20. This will be someone not on the council now.

  (more…)

New Council Districts in Orange City

Tuesday, May 19th, 2009

Orange district one, yellow district 2, red district 3, green district 4 and purple district 5

proposed map to be adopted in June.

proposed map to be adopted in June.

Flooding on Industrial Drive from rain.

Tuesday, May 19th, 2009

The rains of May 18 and 19th have closed a part of Industrial Dr. The access to businesses and the Orange City Post Office have been effected by about 6 inches of rain that had fallen by 9 am. Industrial Drive Flooding again

Flooding after rains is common on this busy road.

Council person Paul Rasch uses district map to other ends.

Thursday, May 14th, 2009

The district boundary work shop, held on Wednesday May 13Th, became a tool of political attack.   At this second council workshop on the topic, Council person Paul Rasch presented a map that makes good on his desire to end the political career of Council person Thomas Abraham.  Mr. Rasch asked me earlier in the week if there was a way to get Mr. Abraham off the council and suggested perhaps a recall drive could be lead against Mr. Abraham.  I was shocked and dismayed that Mr. Rasch would use his position to construct a map that carried forward his desire to get Mr. Abraham off the council.  This is, however, the same Mr. Rasch that killed term limits when he was the chairperson of the Charter review. 

Joining Mr. Rasch were council members Sherrill, Allebach, Mahoney and Laputka.  Councilman Sherrill has opposed Mr. Abraham’s interest in serving and presence on the council for years largely on racial lines.  Mr. Allebach has been highly critical of Mr. Abraham’s questioning of government expenditures and lack of citizen participation.  Rasch was appointed by the votes of Allebach, Sherrill, Mahoney and Laputka.

The council will reconvene in workshop on Monday, May 18th at 7pm.  They will review Mr. Rasch’s map and seek to assign council district numbers to each area.  The assigning of numbers to council districts will finish the job started Wednesday night.  Mr. Abraham will likely be placed in a district that will be elected this year or that he does not live in.  This will mean Mr. Abraham can finish his term and Mr. Rasch is hoping he won’t be able to run for office.

In addition a second map will be reviewed that will gerrymander two special changes in Mr. Rasch’s map to insure that Mr. Rasch and Mr. Sherrill each have a separate district in which they reside so that they can run and not complete with each other.  Mr. Laputka asked to see only the map that council selected without the gerrymandering in an attempt to distance his position from the gerrymandering move.

The strangest request of the night came from Council person Allebach who asked staff to change the numbers on the population estimates so that Mr. Rasch’s map could be approved.  Staff present nodded their agreement to do that.

A cd recording of this workshop will be available from The City Clerk if you would like to hear it for yourself.  Also, you can listen directly to the meeting recording on the city internet site www.ourorangecity.com

.