Archive for the ‘development’ Category

And now, for the bad news on climate

Tuesday, March 2nd, 2010

Yes, as if the news isn’t bad enough already, with earthquakes in Haiti and Chile, and tsunamis.

Photo from the Chilean earthquake, courtesy of U.S. Dept. of State:

The even worse news is, we’re in for more of this stuff. Earthquakes and tidal waves are being accelerated by global warming. As the ice sheets melt, pressure on the earth’s surface is released. The result – the earth’s surface readjusts, and brings about these quakes and tidal surges.

Read more from About.com’s environmental editor.

Maybe soon there won’t be much swampland left for developers to sell. A little shifting, and much of Florida will sink beneath the ocean. Remember Edgar Cayce’s prophecy?

I’d say, “Look on the bright side,” but things are definitely looking dark for the people of Haiti and Chile, as they struggle to recover. And they might soon be looking very dark in California and other earthquake-prone areas.

Farmton: The saga continues

Monday, March 1st, 2010

I’ve heard about it from quite a few folks in Deltona: The lobbying is on, hot and heavy.

After the School Board dropped its squawk, Deltona was out there alone as the sole objector to the massive development plan. It would put another city on top of Deltona.

Roads and increased traffic and environmental are all part of the objection the city lodged with the Volusia Growth Management Commission. We suspect water and utility questions may have added fuel to the fire.

Now, Deltona watchers are wondering how long it will take city commisisoners to cave, under the persuasive ministrations of Glenn Storch and Ty Harris, who are meeting  with (or “tag-teaming,” Deltona-watchers are calling it)  each commissioner separately,  in their lobbying efforts.

Deputy City Manager Dave Denny and Planning and Developmment Director Chris Bowley are still firm in their opposition to the Farmton development plan. The word is, Acting City Attorney Skip Fowler has been lobbying pro-Farmton.

County Council “blockheads” egg on Farmton opposition

Thursday, February 25th, 2010

Not that the environmental groups weren’t concerned already. But as The Beacon editorial pointed, now they’re downright mad.

Joe Jaynes, former County Council member, told the County Council why they should vote no, and like other speakers at the Feb. 18 Farmton hearing, was insulted for his concerns.

It’s smart growth, County  Chair Frank Bruno said.

Jaynes responded in a e-mail, “Smart growth? Oh yes…the type of “smart” that means to feel a sharp, stinging pain or to suffer keenly from wounds! This type of “smart” growth is the kind that will leave every resident and taxpayer of Volusia County smarting from the stinging pain and wounds of untold environmental impacts and increased taxes to support the most atrocious example of corporate greed and urban sprawl yet seen in Florida. The cloak of “smart” growth must be seen for what it is, the kind that hurts and causes pain, leaving the corporate land owners, bankers and lawyers laughing all the way to the bank with their pockets full of money, having fooled the politicians and public with a clever package of fancy footwork and terminology. They can cloak urban sprawl and environmental destruction with the term “smart”….but some of us can see “the emperor has no clothes on!” 23,000 new homes, 69,000 new residents, millions of square feet of commercial space, no infrastructure, no roads, no schools, in the middle of nowhere? Smart? More like crazy smart. Here, take a dose of this “smart growth”….Ouch…that hurts!”

Conservationist and Soil & Water person Michelle Moen took the council members to task, writing them:

February 22, 2010

Re: Miami Corporation Farmton Local Plan Large-Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment

Greetings Volusia County Council,

I am a landowner and resident of Volusia County. Please enter my comments into the public record.

From the February 18, 2010 county staff report:

On October 15, 2009, the County Council voted six to one to transmit the Farmton Local Plan amendment to the Department of Community Affairs (DCA) for compliance review and the Volusia County Growth Management Commission (VGMC) for a consistency determination.

County Ord. Sec. 90-78.  Comprehensive plan amendments.
(a)   After September 30, 2007, all local governments who desire to adopt a comprehensive plan amendment shall, in accordance with this article, include a finding of school adequacy provided by the applicant prior to transmittal of said amendment to the VGMC and the department.

Proposed amendment FG 6.2:  At the time of adoption of the Farmton Local Plan, the Interlocal Agreement for Public School Facility Planning (ILA) recognizes that there is no school capacity.

The Volusia County Council unlawfully transmitted the amendments to VGMC .

Moen’s arguments could have interesting implications.

In a more forceful manner, she wrote:

Dear friends,

We, the taxpayers of Volusia County, have been ripped off by our government.
Corporate Greed  will feed in Volusia for decades!

Approx. 30,000 new homes
80,000-100,000 new residents
4.7 million square feet of commercial

On Thursday, February 18, our elected Volusia County Council betrayed us. They did not lead but followed the direction of Corporate Greed.   They were not courageous  but knelt before Avarice.   They partnered with deceit and abandoned the public good.

BROKEN PROMISES

Councilwoman Joie Alexander
Councilwoman Pat Northey
Chairman Frank Bruno
Councilman Josh Wagner
Councilman Jack Hayman

When they needed our votes, they all promised protection of our essential Natural Resource Management Area (NRMA) from  urban growth.

But on Thursday, February 18, they all drooled and quivered in anticipation of fulfilling Miami Corporation’s profit plan to destroy 15,000 acres with a direct hit and the rest of it with the pollution and cars of 100,000 new residents.

THE CRIMES THE LIES  THE FOOLS
AND THE DANGER!

Crime: Negligent waste of tax dollars

Our Director of Growth Resource Management, Gregg Stubbs, stood before our elected Volusia County Council and admitted that county staff had expended 1500 hours  promoting this ludicrous and dangerous project.

And the 1500 hours was just a drop in the bucket of tax dollar waste!

It did not include hundreds of hours of county legal staff!

It did not include the pre-application process lasting another year.

We are losing jobs.  We are losing our homes.  Our schools cry for funds.

AND OUR COUNTY SPENDS OUR MONEY  AND THEIR TIME CATERING TO MIAMI  CORPORATION’S GREED!!

LYING to the people who elected them and  pay their salaries. This is what we have been told for over one year:  If we don’t allow Corporate Greed to build an unincorporated city in the wet woods,  they will build ten acre ranchettes  over the entire 47,000.
But when confronted with the truth by EDGEWATER CITIZENS’ ALLIANCE FOR RESPONSIBLE GROWTH,  (ECARD)  our county legal staff  admitted that ranchettes are an OPTION.

FOOLISHNESS: The taxpayer should be grateful to Corporate Greed.  If it wasn’t for Corporate Greed, we would never be able to buy this land for conservation. Corporate Greed is willing to cut us a deal “Give us a city and we will give you conservation lands – lots of it”

THE TRUTH:   24,323 acres of this land lies within the wetland mitigation bank.  They cannot develop that.  Even if they wanted to take it out of the mitigation bank, it is just too sodden.  That is why it is called a WETLAND mitigation bank. That leaves about 23,000 acres left to develop.  They are legally entitled to 2,300 clustered homes on 23,000 acres. And under our own good law, those 2,300 homes must be clustered or grouped together out of environmentally sensitive areas (like the WETLAND mitigation bank) and near existing infrastructure.

FOOLISHNESS:  County Council: “The taxpayers will never be able to buy the land!” Well, the  fools we elected  made sure of that. Thanks to them, they have increased the value of this land beyond comprehension for the benefit of Corporate Greed.

MORE FOOLISHNESS:
WATER
ROADS
SCHOOLS

THIS IS WHAT THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS HAS TO SAY:
. .   no additional infrastructure is planned to serve the proposed development through the Capital Improvements Element, the Future Transportation Map and the ten year water supply plan of the County and/or potable water and sewer providers.
Furthermore, the size of the development areas, their sprawling configuration across one of the most environmentally sensitive areas of the county, their fragmentation of the natural environment, the lack of meaningful and predictable development controls to achieve the desired urban form, and the lack of planning for public facilities, result in the amendment not meeting the requirements of Ch. 2008-191, Section 2, Laws of Florida

County Response: There are no capital improvements necessary for the Farmton Local Plan

Seriously, that is their response.  I am not joking.

This is  a plan that is not planned.  It can be condensed into the following statement:

“We will figure it all out later”

DANGER TAXPAYER! DANGER!
Our elected county council has set a treacherous path for us. Not only have they wasted our money and will waste so very much more they have set a Precedent for other bordering landowners to follow.  Landowners who salivated in anticipation, represented by the same attorney who represents Corporate Greed.  They know, and our elected know, that once this door is open, there will be more new unincorporated cities for us to build.

LURKING DANGER. While  Corporate Greed will begin building Phase I ASAP, the major new city would not begin until 2060 –  OR when the market revives - bank on that date getting revised!!!

MORE DANGER!   This property is dangerously low lying. Over half of it is in the floodplain.  By destroying it, our elected is placing us all in harm’s way!

WHAT CAN I DO?

Send money. This is the most immediate and best action you can take. This will be a court case.  Without money, we have already lost.

If you have already donated, donate more.

Ask your friends and family to donate to:
ECARD
465 Wildwood Drive
New Smyrna Beach, FL 32168

Good luck Volusia!
Michele

Water worries aren’t new

Friday, February 12th, 2010

Water concerns are nothing new. I stumbled upon this information on microfiche at the public library, months ago. It never got into print, for lack of space:

Back in June,1978, the DeLand Sun News reported the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) was concerned about population growth and increased demand for water.
“Florida must increase freshwater resources and clamp down on water waste to keep up with its growing population,” the USGS stated in 1978.
The Floridan aquifer and other sources were producing at maximum capacity, but not at a level that would keep pace with the demand for water throughout the state.
The USGS noted state population increased 1.7 million between 1970 and 1975, and daily water demands jumped 30 percent.
The trend hasn’t quit:
• According to more recent data from the USGS, groundwater withdrawals in Florida grew from 2,787 million gallons a day (mgd) in 1970 to 4,242 (mgd) in 2005.
• In Volusia County, groundwater withdrawals grew from 30.77 mgd in 1970 to 97.02 in 2000 — more than triple the amount of water coming out of the aquifer. By 2007, groundwater withdrawals rose to 121 mgd, according to the Water Management District.
• The two biggest users have been public-water suppliers and agriculture. Suppliers drank up 590 mgd in 2007, and agriculture drew 347 mgd.

In the fall, when I found the old USGS warning , Volusia County’s population was expected to increase 83 percent over its 1995 figure of 403,353 by 2030, and the Water District expected water demand to grow by 30 percent during that period.

Now, those population projections have been scaled back around 20 percent. That’s mostly due to the economy and the bust in construction. Proper water conservation can decrease the need for water even further — we use twice as much water per person (149 mgd) as in parts of this county and in Europe.

Along with conservation, some real growth management will be the best thing for the aquifer, our rivers, open spaces and ecologically sensitive areas. How long can any economy depend on population growth?

A better season for the environment

Wednesday, December 23rd, 2009

While we may not live in the best of all possible worlds, this year is ending pretty well for the West Volusia environment and the people who care about it. Consider:

The Volusia Growth Management Commission backpedaled from its backpedaling on rules changes — a decided victory for West Volusians worried about over-development. The commission had been poised to pull its own teeth of any authority it has to to say “no” to developers. They acted in response to all you wonderful citizens showing up at their meetings to voice your concerns.

The Department of Community Affairs has turned into a real watchdog. DCA is actually saying “no” to bogus land-use changes that would allow development in the middle of delicate ecosystems and let conservation lands be paved over. Way to go! I hope DCA is able to keep it up. Knowing our Legislature and the forces of development, it may not.

While the County Council appears determined to stay on its path of pushing development for big interests, a lot of city commissions and councils have woken up and smelled the coffee. It seems like they’re starting to realize the mess unbridled growth has brought. They are also looking to work together on water-supply issues, and giving at least slightly more than token attention to conservation programs.

Hometown Democracy will be on the ballot in 2010.

We have a president who understands concerns about global warming, air pollution and water pollution are not just silly or made up .

We have a cadre of dedicated individuals and groups who care and are working hard to protect our resources and the environment. Thank you: Riverkeeper, Volusia Soil & Water people, Eric West, Greg Gimbert, Putnam Environmental Council, Volusia-Flagler Sierra Club, Betty O’Laughlin, League of Women Voters, Bill Flowers, and so many more people ..

From The Book of Common Prayer, Holy Eucharist Prayer C:

God of all power, Ruler of the Universe, you are worthy of glory and praise .

Glory to you forever and ever.

At your command all things came to be: the vast expanse of interstellar space, galaxies, suns the planets in their courses, and this fragile earth, our island home.

By your will they were created and have their being.

scutum_hires

From the primal elements you brought forth the human race, and blessed us with memory, reason, and skill. You made us the rulers of creation. But we turned against you, and betrayed your trust, and we turned against one another.

Have mercy, Lord, for we are sinners in your sight.

Again and again, you called us to return. Through prophets and sages you revealed your righteous Law. And in the fullness o f time you sent your only Son, born of a woman, to fulfill your Law, to open for us the way of freedom and peace.

As we await the coming of the Christ child, let us turn back and earn the trust of God, who created the universe and all the glory around us, from galaxies down to the smallest electron. It is all his, and we are his trustees.

Let us take care of this good Earth and our little part of it.

Amen.

Pay your taxes, shut up, and keep out

Monday, May 25th, 2009

Back, by popular request (of at least one person):

My 2 Cents’ Worth by Pat Hatfield

366058111Governmental officials and developers seem to want to get together and make decisions about our future, without consulting the public.

Take recommended changes to Volusia Growth Management Commission (VGMC) rules. Developers and municipalities angry at having their plans thwarted proposed these changes.

According to one proposed change, members of the public will no longer be able to request a public hearing before the VGMC OKs a land-use change.

Arguments that citizens can ask their city commission or the County Council to request a hearing are ridiculous. The land-use change would be approved long before a citizen could get a council member’s attention.

The VGMC is not for the public, according to the argument. It’s for governmental use to approve development requests, it would seem.

Another proposed rule would shift the burden of proof from the person or entity requesting a land-use change, to the person challenging such a change. This would make it easier to overcome objections to development.

At least the VGMC will hear public comments about the proposed rule changes, when it meets at 7 p.m. Wednesday, May 27, at Daytona Beach City Hall, 301 S. Ridgewood Ave. (U.S. 1).

If the VGMC is rendered toothless — which it mostly is already — then perhaps Florida Hometown Democracy’s proposed amendment to the Florida Constitution is what we need, to protect our communities from overdevelopment.

If that amendment gets on the ballot and is approved by voters, land-use changes, which generally allow growth and higher density, would have to be approved by the voters.

Orlando-based Floridians for Smarter Growth, described by Orlando Business Journal as “a coalition of business interests,” opposes the amendment, and has launched a publicity campaign to keep the measure from passing, claiming it would “permanently freeze economic growth.”

Sounds like the amendment would give the public a voice in opposing unbridled growth.

The public was kept largely at bay when the St. Johns River Water Management District Governing Board heard arguments about the Yankee Lake project, which will allow Seminole County to pump water out of the St. Johns River.

E-mails from concerned citizens were blocked from board members. Instead of finding a location large enough to accommodate the crowd, people were shuttled off to different rooms in the building where the Governing Board meets. Others were barred from the building.

<i>"Are you authorized to enter this meeting? May I see your papers?"</I>

"Are you authorized to enter this meeting? May I see your papers?"

Here’s what one of those people, Peggy Bellflower, wrote about it: “I was one of the citizens locked out of the hearing for several hours, until we charged in at the break, when folks came out the locked doors. It was nightmarish out there. But, yes, I did get in and was allowed to speak. I witnessed at least 50 other citizens, some of them senior citizens 80-90 years old, leave for home after standing in the hot sun at the locked doors for quite some time.”

DeBary officials could tell the Water Management District where to get a big tent, large enough to hold the public. They used one for the second reading of the DeBary Downs proposal.

Public say about the public good is being discouraged. Sometimes subtly, sometimes obviously, sometimes obliviously. If we don’t speak up now, the chance may disappear.

(originally published in the May 21-24 print edition of the newspaper, without the artwork and snazzy headline)


Niagara folly: insanity in Central Florida

Thursday, May 14th, 2009

A couple of people have asked me for links to this. It was published in the hard-copy edition of the paper as an opinions piece in my occasional column, “My 2 cents worth.”

Here it is:

The St. Johns River Water Management District told the cities and counties that beginning in 2013, their water withdrawals from wells into the Floridan aquifer are reaching maximum sustainable limits.

So, the cities will have to look elsewhere for enough water to supply the public with drinking water. That means, in practicality, the St. Johns River. It’s for the public good, the Water Management District tells us.

Water worries didn’t stop economic-development agencies from offering millions in tax rebates and incentives to entice Niagara Bottling Inc. of California to come to Lake County, where the bottler planned to draw a half-million gallons of water a day from wells drilled into the aquifer.

That’s right, the water would come out of the very same aquifer over which municipalities have had their hands slapped, like a kid in a cookie jar, and told, “No more.”

Development again triumphed over the public good. It wasn’t Niagara’s folly. The bottler just followed the carrot under its nose.

If they hadn’t been operating under the radar, out of public view, the economic-development honchos would have realized what they should have already known — this is a bad plan, in a region already afflicted with a water crisis.

The public outrage began as soon as the plan went public.

That didn’t stop the Water Management District staff from OK’ing the 500-thousand-gallons-a-day plan.

[Note: that is being contested by the by the Lake County Board of County Commissioners and the city of Groveland. An administrative-law judge heard the case last month, and will render a decision.]

The Water Management District’s mission statement reads, “We will ensure the sustainable use and protection of water resources for the benefit of the people of the District and the state of Florida.”

Approving a plan to bottle and ship 500,000 gallons a day from our dwindling water supply doesn’t benefit the people of the district, when cities are strictly limited on withdrawals from the aquifer for public drinking water.

The City of DeLand, for instance, can increase its withdrawal from 6.41 million gallons a day (mgd) now to 6.81 mgd in 2016, to accommodate its growing population. That’s less than half-a-million gallons a day, or less than what the bottler will ship out of the area every day.

By 2015, 4.8 mgd of that city water must come from an alternate source. This drives the city to the river.

So, the approval doesn’t benefit the public, or the river, which the Water Management District is mandated to protect.

In a few years, Niagara will likely draw from the endangered river, too. You see, the Water Management District wants Niagara to find alternative-water sources after 2013, just like the cities.

How can all this be anything but insanity?

The justification is, according to the WMD Web site, “The amount allocated for bottling plants represents approximately 1/10 of 1 percent of the groundwater used.”

A trifling amount, when it’s wanted for development. Too much, when it’s wanted for local drinking water.

Folly.

Note: Read the related news story at http://beacononlinenews.com/news/daily/1700

St. Johns River Water Management District to decide fate of Yankee Lake

Thursday, April 9th, 2009

A meeting in Palatka Monday will do more than look at one request to tap water from the St. Johns River. It will tell us the course the Water Management District wants to chart for us in Central Florida.

How are we to use water? Where are we to get it from? How shall we conserve it and our natural and environmental resources?

Here’s what Jimmy Orth of the St. Johns Riverkeeper watchdog group wrote last week:

On April 13th, the Governing Board of the St. Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD) will vote on a permit from Seminole County to withdraw an average of 5.5 million gallons of water a day (MGD) from the St. Johns River. Seminole County’s Yankee Lake facility would eventually be able to withdraw up to 55 MGD.

This initial permit from Seminole County represents the beginning of an Alternative Water Supply (AWS) program that could eventually result in the withdrawal of over 260 million gallons of water a day (MGD) from the St. Johns and Ocklawaha.

This is not just about the future of the St. Johns and Ocklawaha. This is a fight to protect all of our water resources in Florida – our aquifer, rivers, and springs.

Here is how you can help:

1) Attend the SJRWMD Governing Board meeting in Palatka on Monday, April 13th at 1:00 p.m. where they will decide the fate of the Seminole County water withdrawal permit.
SJRWMD Headquarters
4049 Reid Street
Palatka, FL 32177

2) Send an e-mail to the SJRWMD Governing Board members and Governor Charlie Crist and let them know that you oppose surface water withdrawals and support water conservation.

Carving up Osteen

Monday, April 6th, 2009

So the County of Volusia and the City of Deltona will decide the fate of Osteen.

This is what makes me skittly about joint-planning agreements (JPAs). Why should Deltona be deciding the fate of its country neighbors? That’s like giving Hitler the green light to decide the future of Poland and Czechoslovakia.

Can the Osteen people count on the county to protect them? Doesn’t look like it. Too developer friendly.

There needs to be commercial development, in the right places. People need to shop and go out for dinner and entertainment. Deltona should build what it needs within its own city limits. If it’s all already built out by greedy developers with the city’s help, then go to Orange City or Port Orange to shop.

I heard that at one meeting, someone glowingly described how State Road 415 could look like Dunlawton Avenue in Port Orange. That’s a lot like Saxon Boulevard/Enterprise Road in Orange City. If the people of Deltona can’t drive over to O.C. for a night out at Olive Garden, shame on them.

After talking to a lot of Osteeners (Osteenites?), the overwhelming feedback was, “Deltona, leave us alone.”

They don’t want residential villages or commercial villages. They want to stay rural. Maybe the county and Deltona should respect that.